Hi Thomas,
thanks for the question. Here is the status:
| Tables: | |
|---|---|
| * introduce allowCollapse attribute for paragraphs following nested tables to encode WW and HTML-like tables. | Not put up for discussion. |
| * declare sub tables as deprecated | Under discussion in the Accessibility SC. |
| Numbering | |
| * introduce text:level-text attribute to encode arbitrary number formats | Rejected. |
| * introduce text:num-follow-char to encode WW-like numbering | Partly accepted. |
| * introduce text:list-override to encode WW-like numbering | Strongly rejected. |
| * declare style:list-level-properties/@text:space-before as deprecated. Effect can be achieved with paragraph indent. | Rejected. |
| Master-page styles | |
| * add header-first and footer-first to encode WW-like page-styles | Not put up for discussion |
| * modify master-page styles such that WW-like sections can be encoded; current CSS3.0 like text:sections are not applicable | Not put up for discussion |
| * declare the style:next-style-name attribute of master-page declarations as deprecated. | Not put up for discussion |
| Styles: | |
| * allow deriving paragraph-family styles from text-family styles. | Not put up for discussion |
| "Break chars" | |
| * introduce a | Not put up for discussion |
| Fields: | |
| * enhance field support by introducing a <text:field-start/> and a <text:field-end/> element to which metadata can be attached. | Rejected |
| Change tracking: | |
| * introduce change tracking for tables | Not put up for discussion |
| * introduce change tracking on property level | Not put up for discussion |
| Discourage the use of the following OD features for MOOX interop: | |
| * nested frames | Not put up for discussion / Internally communicated as rejected. |
| * current CSS3.0 like text:sections | Not put up for discussion / Internally communicated as rejected. |
| * use fo:break-before instead of fo:break-after | Not put up for discussion / Internally communicated as rejected. |
| * use fo:margin-* for tables | Not put up for discussion / Internally communicated as rejected. |
In general I must confess the OpenDocument TC didn't picked up my discsussion topics... (It's listed as suggested but never has been put for discussion into the agenda). Additionally I had a lot of private communiation where my ideas where communicated as unwanted/rejected.
To get an idea of whats discussed for ODF1.2 take a look at:
